Sidhu v. Georgia Macon Contractors & Equipment, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sidhu v. Georgia Macon Contractors & Equipment, Inc.

587 S.E.2d 252, 263 Ga. App. 100, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2758, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1127

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 5, 2003

DocketA03A1625

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 587 S.E.2d 252 (Sidhu v. Georgia Macon Contractors & Equipment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sidhu v. Georgia Macon Contractors & Equipment, Inc., 587 S.E.2d 252, 263 Ga. App. 100, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2758, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1127 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Phipps, Judge.

Because appellants were denied their right to a hearing on their motion for new trial, we vacate the judgment appealed and remand for further proceedings.

Ricky Heath Plumbing Company, Inc. (Heath) sued appellants, P. S. Sidhu and others (referred to collectively as Sidhu), in the Magistrate Court of Bibb County. On motion by Sidhu, Georgia Macon Contractors & Equipment, Inc. (Georgia Macon) was added as a third-party defendant. On further motion by Sidhu, the case was transferred to the Civil Court of Bibb County. There, Sidhu filed a counterclaim against Heath and a cross-claim against Georgia Macon, and Georgia Macon filed a counterclaim against Sidhu.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of Georgia Macon and Heath against Sidhu; judgments were entered awarding $25,000 in damages to Georgia Macon and $23,194.71 in damages to Heath. Sidhu filed a motion for new trial, asserting that during the trial the court [101]*101had committed legal errors and abused its discretion in various rulings and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Although Sidhu requested a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion on the day it was filed without holding a hearing.

Decided September 5, 2003. Burnette & Driggers, G. Samuel Burnette, Benjamin D. Driggers, for appellants. Jones, Cork & Miller, Christopher B. Jarrard, for appellee.

Sidhu initially appealed both judgments but later withdrew its appeal against Heath. In its appeal against Georgia Macon, Sidhu has enumerated seven errors. Sidhu first contends that the trial court erred in denying its request for a hearing on the motion for new trial. We agree. In Gantt v. Sweatman,1 this court held that, absent a waiver, a movant for new trial is entitled to a hearing on the motion in the trial court before a ruling is made thereon;² and that if the movant’s right to such a hearing has been denied, we must return the case to the trial court for a hearing and disposition of the motion before the merits of the remaining claims of error are addressed.³ Therefore, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for a hearing on Sidhu’s motion for new trial. If the trial court denies the motion, Sidhu may then file another appeal.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Blackburn, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phipps, Judge.

Because appellants were denied their right to a hearing on their motion for new trial, we vacate the judgment appealed and remand for further proceedings.

Ricky Heath Plumbing Company, Inc. (Heath) sued appellants, P. S. Sidhu and others (referred to collectively as Sidhu), in the Magistrate Court of Bibb County. On motion by Sidhu, Georgia Macon Contractors & Equipment, Inc. (Georgia Macon) was added as a third-party defendant. On further motion by Sidhu, the case was transferred to the Civil Court of Bibb County. There, Sidhu filed a counterclaim against Heath and a cross-claim against Georgia Macon, and Georgia Macon filed a counterclaim against Sidhu.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of Georgia Macon and Heath against Sidhu; judgments were entered awarding $25,000 in damages to Georgia Macon and $23,194.71 in damages to Heath. Sidhu filed a motion for new trial, asserting that during the trial the court [101]*101had committed legal errors and abused its discretion in various rulings and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Although Sidhu requested a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion on the day it was filed without holding a hearing.

Decided September 5, 2003. Burnette & Driggers, G. Samuel Burnette, Benjamin D. Driggers, for appellants. Jones, Cork & Miller, Christopher B. Jarrard, for appellee.

Sidhu initially appealed both judgments but later withdrew its appeal against Heath. In its appeal against Georgia Macon, Sidhu has enumerated seven errors. Sidhu first contends that the trial court erred in denying its request for a hearing on the motion for new trial. We agree. In Gantt v. Sweatman,1 this court held that, absent a waiver, a movant for new trial is entitled to a hearing on the motion in the trial court before a ruling is made thereon;² and that if the movant’s right to such a hearing has been denied, we must return the case to the trial court for a hearing and disposition of the motion before the merits of the remaining claims of error are addressed.³ Therefore, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for a hearing on Sidhu’s motion for new trial. If the trial court denies the motion, Sidhu may then file another appeal.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Blackburn, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

587 S.E.2d 252, 263 Ga. App. 100, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2758, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sidhu-v-georgia-macon-contractors-equipment-inc-gactapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack