Sideris v. Town of Huntington
This text of 240 A.D.2d 652 (Sideris v. Town of Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), entered May 23, 1996, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against him dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
A jury verdict should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached its verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129). Determinations of the credibility of the witnesses is for the fact finder, who had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses (see; Frangello v Namm, 157 AD2d 649; Birnbaum v All-State Vehicle, 139 AD2d 553; Sheps v Hall & Co., 112 AD2d 281). The verdict in the defendant’s favor is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in excluding evidence of prior accidents at the site occurring under conditions which were not substantially similar to those of the instant accident (see, Hyde v County of Rensselaer, 51 NY2d 927, 929; Meagher v ARA Servs., 235 AD2d 404). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D.2d 652, 659 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sideris-v-town-of-huntington-nyappdiv-1997.