Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Aloe v. Lehmann

Aloe v. Lehmann

296 A.D.2d 563, 745 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7723
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 29, 2002·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated September 5, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against him on the issue of liability, in effect, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the evidence before the jury was legally sufficient to support its verdict in the defendants’ favor (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493). The verdict was further supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Sideris v Town of Huntington, 240 AD2d 652; Conforti v Gaeta, 190 AD2d 772, 773; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aloe v. Lehmann, 296 A.D.2d 563, 745 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

296 A.D.2d 563 (Aloe v. Lehmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
382 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Conforti v. Gaeta
190 A.D.2d 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Sideris v. Town of Huntington
240 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)