Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.

30 F. Supp. 443, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2060
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 F.R.D. 451
District Court, W.D. New York·Decided October 24, 1939·No. Equity No. 2279; Civil No. 182·Published

Opinion

BURKE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to Rule 56(f) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A. following section 723c, to defer consideration of defendants’ motion for summary judgment to permit depositions to be taken, is denied without prejudice- to the right to renew within twenty days

1. Upon a showing by affidavit or otherwise of knowledge or information on the part of the plaintiffs as to definite and explicit facts sufficient to justify a belief as to the allegations of the complaint;

2. Upon specifying the particular persons whose depositions the plaintiffs desire to take;

3. The particular issues regarding which they desire to examine each of said persons;

4. What in particular the plaintiffs seek to establish by the examination of such person sought to be examined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., 30 F. Supp. 443, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2060 (W.D.N.Y. 1939).

30 F. Supp. 443 (Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.