Home/W.D. New York/Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.

Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.

29 F. Supp. 38, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2236
District Court, W.D. New York·Decided June 21, 1939·No. No. 2279·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Defendants move for a bill of particulars in respect to certain allegations of [39]*39paragraph XX of the Amended Complaint. It is my opinion that the allegations in question, when considered in connection with the other allegations of the Amended Complaint, are sufficient in “definiteness or particularity” to enable the defendants properly to prepare a “responsive pleading or to prepare for trial.” Rule 12 (e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. These matters with respect to which a bill of particulars is sought may be inquired about through interrogatories.' Rule 33 et seq. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., 29 F. Supp. 38, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2236 (W.D.N.Y. 1939).

29 F. Supp. 38 (Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.
31 F. Supp. 483 (E.D. Arkansas, 1940)