Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shuler v. State

Shuler v. State

246 So. 3d 1190
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shuler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 So. 3d 335 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 2017·No. CASE NO.: 2D17–3112·Published

Opinion

As it appears that the proceedings in the circuit court relative to the petitioner's motion for postconviction relief are progressing, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cf, Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n. 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner to file a new petition for writ of mandamus if the postconviction court has not entered a final order on the motion within 90 days of the date of this order, provided that the petitioner is unrepresented by counsel in the postconviction proceeding.

CASANUEVA, WALLACE, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shuler v. State, 246 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

246 So. 3d 1190 (Shuler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)