Shuey v. State
951 So. 2d 67, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3420, 2007 WL 700924
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shuey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4300 →
Opinion
We have reviewed the points raised by the defendant and conclude that only one has merit. The judgment of conviction erroneously states that the defendant pled nolo contendere to the charges when he was actually convicted following a jury trial. We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand to the trial court for correction of this scrivener’s error. See, e.g., Cook v. State, 947 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The defendant correctly concedes that his presence at such correction is unnecessary.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shuey v. State, 951 So. 2d 67, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3420, 2007 WL 700924 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
951 So. 2d 67 (Shuey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cook v. State
947 So. 2d 1207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)