Shuey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shuey v. State

951 So. 2d 67, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3420, 2007 WL 700924

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 9, 2007

DocketNo. 5D05-1914

StatusPublished

This text of 951 So. 2d 67 (Shuey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shuey v. State, 951 So. 2d 67, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3420, 2007 WL 700924 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PLEUS, C.J.

We have reviewed the points raised by the defendant and conclude that only one has merit. The judgment of conviction erroneously states that the defendant pled nolo contendere to the charges when he was actually convicted following a jury trial. We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand to the trial court for correction of this scrivener’s error. See, e.g., Cook v. State, 947 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The defendant correctly concedes that his presence at such correction is unnecessary.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED.

SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLEUS, C.J.

We have reviewed the points raised by the defendant and conclude that only one has merit. The judgment of conviction erroneously states that the defendant pled nolo contendere to the charges when he was actually convicted following a jury trial. We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand to the trial court for correction of this scrivener’s error. See, e.g., Cook v. State, 947 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The defendant correctly concedes that his presence at such correction is unnecessary.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED.

SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

951 So. 2d 67, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3420, 2007 WL 700924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuey-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack