Shotwell v. Thornall

3 N.J.L. 136

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— The action is wholly misconceived. The overseers expended the money of the township, they must account with the town for the money expended; and have no authority to demand the same of defendant below. If any action can be sustained, it must be by the township, in its corporate name,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shotwell v. Thornall, 3 N.J.L. 136 (N.J. 1806).

Pincite

3 N.J.L. 136 (Shotwell v. Thornall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.