Shotwell v. Thornall
3 N.J.L. 136
This text of 3 N.J.L. 136 (Shotwell v. Thornall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shotwell v. Thornall, 3 N.J.L. 136 (N.J. 1806).
Opinion
— The action is wholly misconceived. The overseers expended the money of the township, they must account with the town for the money expended; and have no authority to demand the same of defendant below. If any action can be sustained, it must be by the township, in its corporate name,
Vide 7 Halst. 124. — Ed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shotwell-v-thornall-nj-1806.