Home/Tenth Circuit/Shotkin v. Black

Shotkin v. Black

227 F.2d 523
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 12, 1955
DocketNos. 5126, 5127
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 227 F.2d 523 (Shotkin v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shotkin v. Black, 227 F.2d 523 (10th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissing appellant’s cause of action in the two above-entitled cases for failure to prosecute the same in the trial court. An examination of the record compels the conclusion that the trial court was amply warranted in entering the order appealed from.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bernard M. Shotkin v. William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer, Dr. Clark A. Barnacle, General Electric Company, Henry Tull (Henry W. Toll), Bernard M. Shotkin, Also Known as Barney M. Shotkin, Individually and as Trustee for Bruce Shotkin, Beth Shotkin and Nona Shotkin, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Styles Edison Power and Light Company and Dison Power and Light Company v. General Electric Company
227 F.2d 523 (Tenth Circuit, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 F.2d 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shotkin-v-black-ca10-1955.