Bernard M. Shotkin v. William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer, Dr. Clark A. Barnacle, General Electric Company, Henry Tull (Henry W. Toll), Bernard M. Shotkin, Also Known as Barney M. Shotkin, Individually and as Trustee for Bruce Shotkin, Beth Shotkin and Nona Shotkin, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Styles Edison Power and Light Company and Dison Power and Light Company v. General Electric Company

Tenth Circuit

Bernard M. Shotkin v. William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer, Dr. Clark A. Barnacle, General Electric Company, Henry Tull (Henry W. Toll), Bernard M. Shotkin, Also Known as Barney M. Shotkin, Individually and as Trustee for Bruce Shotkin, Beth Shotkin and Nona Shotkin, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Styles Edison Power and Light Company and Dison Power and Light Company v. General Electric Company

227 F.2d 523

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 10, 1955·No. 5127_1·Published

Opinion

Bernard M. SHOTKIN, Appellant,
v.
William A. BLACK, Dr. Charles A. Rymer, Dr. Clark A.
Barnacle, General Electric Company, Henry Tull
(Henry W. Toll), Appellees.
Bernard M. SHOTKIN, also known as Barney M. Shotkin,
individually and as trustee for Bruce Shotkin, Beth Shotkin
and Nona Shotkin, doing business under the trade name and
styles Edison Power and Light Company and Dison Power and
Light Company, Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al., Appellees.

Nos. 5126, 5127.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1955.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1955.

Bernard M. Shotkin filed a brief, pro se.

Omer Griffin, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Colorado (Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., of Colorado, and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., of Colorado, were with him on the brief), for William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer and Dr. Clark A. Barnacle.

Grant, Shafroth & Toll, Henry W. Toll, and John F. Shafroth, Denver, Colo., filed a brief for General Electric Company.

Ora H. George, Denver, Colo., filed a brief for Henry Tull.

G. M. Westa, Denver, Colo. (John R. Turnquist and Luis D. Rovira, Denver, Colo., were with him on the brief), for Thomas A. Edison, Inc.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissing appellant's cause of action in the two above-entitled cases for failure to prosecute the same in the trial court. An examination of the record compels the conclusion that the trial court was amply warranted in entering the order appealed from.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

227 F.2d 523

Bernard M. SHOTKIN, Appellant,
v.
William A. BLACK, Dr. Charles A. Rymer, Dr. Clark A.
Barnacle, General Electric Company, Henry Tull
(Henry W. Toll), Appellees.
Bernard M. SHOTKIN, also known as Barney M. Shotkin,
individually and as trustee for Bruce Shotkin, Beth Shotkin
and Nona Shotkin, doing business under the trade name and
styles Edison Power and Light Company and Dison Power and
Light Company, Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al., Appellees.

Nos. 5126, 5127.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1955.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1955.

Bernard M. Shotkin filed a brief, pro se.

Omer Griffin, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Colorado (Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., of Colorado, and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., of Colorado, were with him on the brief), for William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer and Dr. Clark A. Barnacle.

Grant, Shafroth & Toll, Henry W. Toll, and John F. Shafroth, Denver, Colo., filed a brief for General Electric Company.

Ora H. George, Denver, Colo., filed a brief for Henry Tull.

G. M. Westa, Denver, Colo. (John R. Turnquist and Luis D. Rovira, Denver, Colo., were with him on the brief), for Thomas A. Edison, Inc.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissing appellant's cause of action in the two above-entitled cases for failure to prosecute the same in the trial court. An examination of the record compels the conclusion that the trial court was amply warranted in entering the order appealed from.

Affirmed.

Bernard M. Shotkin v. William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer, Dr. Clark A. Barnacle, General Electric Company, Henry Tull (Henry W. Toll), Bernard M. Shotkin, Also Known as Barney M. Shotkin, Individually and as Trustee for Bruce Shotkin, Beth Shotkin and Nona Shotkin, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Styles Edison Power and Light Company and Dison Power and Light Company v. General Electric Company, 227 F.2d 523 (10th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

227 F.2d 523 (Bernard M. Shotkin v. William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer, Dr. Clark A. Barnacle, General Electric Company, Henry Tull (Henry W. Toll), Bernard M. Shotkin, Also Known as Barney M. Shotkin, Individually and as Trustee for Bruce Shotkin, Beth Shotkin and Nona Shotkin, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Styles Edison Power and Light Company and Dison Power and Light Company v. General Electric Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related