Shorwitz v. Caminez
140 N.Y.S. 1145
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shorwitz v. Caminez. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 A.D. 758 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 1913·Published
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Kings County reversed, with 10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs, upon the authority of Gibbs v. Prindle, 11 App. Div. 470, 42 N. Y. Supp. 329, Smith v. Cayuga Lake Cement Co., 107 App. Div. 524, 95 N. Y. Supp, 236, Webb v. Parker, 130 App. Div. 92,114 N. Y. Supp. 489, and Kretsch v. Denofrio, 137 App. Div. 617, 122 N. Y. Supp. 242. See, also, 152 App. Div. 758, 137 N. Y. Supp. 545.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shorwitz v. Caminez, 140 N.Y.S. 1145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
140 N.Y.S. 1145 (Shorwitz v. Caminez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibbs v. Prindle
11 A.D. 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Smith v. Cayuga Lake Cement Co.
107 A.D. 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Webb v. Parker
130 A.D. 92 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Kretsch v. Denofrio
137 A.D. 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Shorwitz v. Caminez
152 A.D. 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Gibbs v. Prindle
42 N.Y.S. 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)