Shorwitz v. Caminez
155 A.D. 915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shorwitz v. Caminez. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 A.D. 758 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1913·Published
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the authority of Gibbs v. Prindle (11 App. Div. 470); Smith v. Cayuga Lake Cement Co. (107 id. 534); Webb v. Parker (130 id. 92), and Kretsch v. Denofrio (137 id. 617). Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shorwitz v. Caminez, 155 A.D. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
155 A.D. 915 (Shorwitz v. Caminez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibbs v. Prindle
11 A.D. 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)