Shorwitz v. Caminez

140 N.Y.S. 1145

This text of 140 N.Y.S. 1145 (Shorwitz v. Caminez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shorwitz v. Caminez, 140 N.Y.S. 1145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order of the County Court of Kings County reversed, with 10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs, upon the authority of Gibbs v. Prindle, 11 App. Div. 470, 42 N. Y. Supp. 329, Smith v. Cayuga Lake Cement Co., 107 App. Div. 524, 95 N. Y. Supp, 236, Webb v. Parker, 130 App. Div. 92,114 N. Y. Supp. 489, and Kretsch v. Denofrio, 137 App. Div. 617, 122 N. Y. Supp. 242. See, also, 152 App. Div. 758, 137 N. Y. Supp. 545.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibbs v. Prindle
11 A.D. 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Smith v. Cayuga Lake Cement Co.
107 A.D. 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Webb v. Parker
130 A.D. 92 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Kretsch v. Denofrio
137 A.D. 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Shorwitz v. Caminez
152 A.D. 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Gibbs v. Prindle
42 N.Y.S. 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 N.Y.S. 1145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shorwitz-v-caminez-nyappdiv-1913.