Shorwitz v. Caminez
This text of 140 N.Y.S. 1145 (Shorwitz v. Caminez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Kings County reversed, with 10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs, upon the authority of Gibbs v. Prindle, 11 App. Div. 470, 42 N. Y. Supp. 329, Smith v. Cayuga Lake Cement Co., 107 App. Div. 524, 95 N. Y. Supp, 236, Webb v. Parker, 130 App. Div. 92,114 N. Y. Supp. 489, and Kretsch v. Denofrio, 137 App. Div. 617, 122 N. Y. Supp. 242. See, also, 152 App. Div. 758, 137 N. Y. Supp. 545.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 N.Y.S. 1145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shorwitz-v-caminez-nyappdiv-1913.