Short v. Cherokee Manufacturing Co.
59 S.E. 1115, 3 Ga. App. 377, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 153
Opinion
The alleged defect in the machinery and the unsafe condition of the floor, which concurrently caused the plaintiff’s injury, according to his own evidence were known to him, or by the exercise of ordinary care could have been known to him. Being, therefore, the ordinary risks of his employment and assumed by him, the judgment of nonsuit was properly granted. Civil Code, §2612; Banks v. Schofield’s Sons Co., 126 Ga. 671 (55 S. E. 939); Crown Cotton Mills v. McNally, 123 Ga. 35 (51 S. E. 13). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Short v. Cherokee Manufacturing Co., 59 S.E. 1115, 3 Ga. App. 377, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 153 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).
59 S.E. 1115 (Short v. Cherokee Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Callahan v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Corp.
126 S.E. 278 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Texas Co. v. Hearn
98 S.E. 419 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
City of Atlanta v. Hagan
93 S.E. 541 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Stevens v. Bibb Manufacturing Co.
86 S.E. 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Jellico v. White & Co.
76 S.E. 599 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Henderson
65 S.E. 297 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)