Sholgen v. Lipsett, Inc.

14 Misc. 2d 296, 116 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1530
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1952·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Arthur H. Schwartz, J.

A member of a union which has signed a collective agreement with an employer brings this proceeding to compel arbitration under that agreement. Petitioner, as an employee, is not a party to that agreement. Under the [297]*297arbitration terms thereof, only the union has the right to demand arbitration and not any individual members of the union who may have a grievance. To permit individual employees to invoke the arbitration machinery of a collective agreement would disrupt the proper operation of such procedures. The motion is therefore denied. Since the union has submitted an affidavit to the effect that it has no objection to a determination of petitioner’s grievance by arbitration, this motion is denied without prejudice to a demand for arbitration by the union.

Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sholgen v. Lipsett, Inc., 14 Misc. 2d 296, 116 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1530 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1952).

14 Misc. 2d 296 (Sholgen v. Lipsett, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Village of Walden v. Teamsters Local Union No. 445
2025 NY Slip Op 05090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Soto v. Lenscraft Optical Corp.
7 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Cox v. R. H. Macy & Co.
14 Misc. 2d 294 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)