Sholakh v. Shah

2025 Ohio 2533

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: July 17, 2025
• Docket: 114833
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as Sholakh v. Shah, 2025-Ohio-2533.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

ALEEM SHOLAKH, :

Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 114833 v. :

KAUSHIK SHAH, :

Defendant-Appellee. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: July 17, 2025

Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-24-105423

Appearances:

Aleem Sholakh, pro se.

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.:

This cause came to be heard on the accelerated docket pursuant to

App.R. 11.1 and Loc.App.R. 11.1. Consistent with the purpose of an accelerated

appeal, this court shall render a brief and conclusory decision. See Imani Home

Health Care L.L.C. v. Visionary Group, L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-173, ¶ 1 (8th Dist.), citing

State v. Trone, 2020-Ohio-384, ¶ 1 (8th Dist.); see also App.R. 11.1(E). Plaintiff-appellant Aleem Sholakh, pro se, appeals the trial court’s

judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice upon finding the statute of

limitations had expired.1 Upon review, we reverse the judgment of dismissal and

remand with instructions for the trial court to reinstate the case for further

proceedings.

Under his sole assignment of error, Sholakh argues the trial court

erred in granting defendant Kaushik Shah’s motion to dismiss for failure to file the

complaint within the two-year statute of limitations under R.C. 2305.10. The record

shows that Sholakh filed the complaint on October 15, 2024, in which he raised a

negligence claim arising from an alleged motor-vehicle accident that occurred on

October 14, 2022. The defendant’s motion to dismiss erroneously argued the statute

of limitations expired on October 14, 2024, which was a legally recognized holiday

known as Columbus Day. As argued by Sholakh on appeal, he was entitled to file his

complaint the following business day. See R.C. 1.14; Civ.R. 6(A). Accordingly,

appellant’s assignment of error is sustained.

Judgment reversed; case remanded. The trial court is instructed to

reinstate the case for further proceedings.

It is ordered that appellant recover from appellee costs herein taxed.

The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

1 No appellee’s brief has been filed. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the

common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27

of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

______________________ SEAN C. GALLAGHER, JUDGE

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, P.J., and MICHAEL JOHN RYAN, J., CONCUR