Shoffeitt v. State
This text of 270 S.E.2d 90 (Shoffeitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, surety on two supersedeas bonds, appeals from the entry of final judgment for their forfeiture. A thorough and diligent review of the record in this case and the authorities cited by appellant reveals that there was full compliance with the statutory provisions applicable to bond forfeiture. There was no error. Robinson v. Brown, 146 Ga. 257 (91 SE 31) (1916).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 S.E.2d 90, 154 Ga. App. 108, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoffeitt-v-state-gactapp-1980.