Shoffeitt v. Busbee

279 S.E.2d 764, 158 Ga. App. 47, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2065
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 27, 1981
Docket61293
StatusPublished

This text of 279 S.E.2d 764 (Shoffeitt v. Busbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shoffeitt v. Busbee, 279 S.E.2d 764, 158 Ga. App. 47, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2065 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

The order of the trial court granting judgment on the pleadings to the defendants was correct since all issues raised below have already been decided adversely to appellant. Shoffeitt v. State, 154 Ga. App. 108 (270 SE2d 90) (1980). Appellant has moved this court to remand this case to the trial court for failure to include one defendant in the final order. That motion is denied because the trial court has corrected the judgment nunc pro tunc as it has the authority to do under Code Ann. § 81A-160 (g). Gresham v. Rogers, 147 Ga. App. 189, 191 (3) (248 SE2d 225) (1978). The judgment as it now stands is in favor of all defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gresham v. Rogers
248 S.E.2d 225 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Shoffeitt v. State
270 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 S.E.2d 764, 158 Ga. App. 47, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoffeitt-v-busbee-gactapp-1981.