Shoemaker v. Commissioner

20 B.T.A. 1035, 1930 BTA LEXIS 1976
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided September 29, 1930·No. Docket No. 39422.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION.

Love ;

The only question at issue in this case is: whether or not the value of real estate held by husband and wife as tenants by the [1036] entirety in the'Commonwealth of Pennsylvania should be included in the gross estate of the deceased husband.

That very much dismissed question was finally decided by the Supreme Court in the case of Tyler v. United States, 281 U. S. 497.

In that case, the Supreme Court held that section 302 (e) of the Revenue Act of 1924 (and corresponding sections of other acts) were not unconstitutional, and in compliance with the mandate of the statute, the value of such real estate should be included in the gross estate of the decedent.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shoemaker v. Commissioner, 20 B.T.A. 1035, 1930 BTA LEXIS 1976 (bta 1930).

20 B.T.A. 1035 (Shoemaker v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shoemaker v. Commissioner
20 B.T.A. 1035 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)