Shockley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shockley v. State

303 S.W.3d 168, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2010 WL 605313

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketWD 70513

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.W.3d 168 (Shockley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shockley v. State, 303 S.W.3d 168, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2010 WL 605313 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Shockley appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his convictions and sentences for two counts of first-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, two counts of armed criminal action, one count of unlawful use of a weapon, and one count of resisting arrest. Shockley claims that he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Shockley appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his convictions and sentences for two counts of first-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, two counts of armed criminal action, one count of unlawful use of a weapon, and one count of resisting arrest. Shockley claims that he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 S.W.3d 168, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2010 WL 605313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shockley-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack