Lewis v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lewis v. Division of Employment Security

303 S.W.3d 168, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 185

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. WD 71167·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Loretta Lewis appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) order affirming the determination that Lewis is disqualified from receiving unemployment security benefits. Lewis contends that the Commission erred in affirming the order because: (1) Lewis did not voluntarily quit her job but was effectively terminated; and (2) even if Lewis voluntarily quit her employment, her employer effectively moved up her date of termination from January 27, 2009, to January 22, 2009. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Loretta Lewis appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) order affirming the determination that Lewis is disqualified from receiving unemployment security benefits. Lewis contends that the Commission erred in affirming the order because: (1) Lewis did not voluntarily quit her job but was effectively terminated; and (2) even if Lewis voluntarily quit her employment, her employer effectively moved up her date of termination from January 27, 2009, to January 22, 2009. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Lewis v. Division of Employment Security, 303 S.W.3d 168, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 185 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

303 S.W.3d 168 (Lewis v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related