Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.
734 P.2d 12, 84 Or. App. 423
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 Or. App. 104 →
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order that dismissed “all proceedings on plaintiffs motions and allegations and garnishees’ answers on oath.” That order was the result of a hearing held on January 13, 1986. Because plaintiff has failed to provide us with a transcript of that hearing, we are unable to review the merits of her assignments of error. See Reeder v. Kay, 276 Or 1111, 1115, 557 P2d 673 (1976).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shlim v. Charapata, Inc., 734 P.2d 12, 84 Or. App. 423 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
734 P.2d 12 (Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reeder v. Kay
557 P.2d 673 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1976)