Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.

734 P.2d 12, 84 Or. App. 423

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 18, 1987

Docket82-4-149; CA A39363

StatusPublished

This text of 734 P.2d 12 (Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shlim v. Charapata, Inc., 734 P.2d 12, 84 Or. App. 423 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from an order that dismissed “all proceedings on plaintiffs motions and allegations and garnishees’ answers on oath.” That order was the result of a hearing held on January 13, 1986. Because plaintiff has failed to provide us with a transcript of that hearing, we are unable to review the merits of her assignments of error. See Reeder v. Kay, 276 Or 1111, 1115, 557 P2d 673 (1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from an order that dismissed “all proceedings on plaintiffs motions and allegations and garnishees’ answers on oath.” That order was the result of a hearing held on January 13, 1986. Because plaintiff has failed to provide us with a transcript of that hearing, we are unable to review the merits of her assignments of error. See Reeder v. Kay, 276 Or 1111, 1115, 557 P2d 673 (1976).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

734 P.2d 12, 84 Or. App. 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shlim-v-charapata-inc-orctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack