Shirley v. State
63 S.E. 583, 5 Ga. App. 611, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 82
Opinion
1. The verdict is authorized by the evidence.
2. In order that this court may consider an exception to the judge’s refusal to give a request to charge, it must appear not only that it was in writing, but also that it was tendered to the court before the jury retired “to consider of their verdict.” Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shirley v. State, 63 S.E. 583, 5 Ga. App. 611, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 82 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
63 S.E. 583 (Shirley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Dyke v. Van Dyke
119 S.E. 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Hodges v. Thompson
102 S.E. 379 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Waller v. State
97 S.E. 876 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Weeks v. Reliance Fertilizer Co.
97 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Stephens v. State
95 S.E. 537 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Johnson v. State
94 S.E. 630 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. McDaniel
93 S.E. 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Barrow
89 S.E. 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Lyon
89 S.E. 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)