Johnson v. State
This text of 91 S.E. 876 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence as to the guilt of the accused was conflicting, but the jury trying the case were properly instructed by the court, and returned a verdict of guilty. The newly discovered evidence was cumulative in its character, and, the trial judge having approved the verdict, and there being some evidence to authorize the conviction, this court will not disturb the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 876, 19 Ga. App. 447, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-gactapp-1917.