Shirley v. State
34 So. 3d 148, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5584, 2010 WL 1687636
Opinion
The order now before us is affirmed without prejudice to permit Appellant to file another motion challenging the amount of credit for time served following conclusion of the appeal in 3D09-1717. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a) (“A court may at any time correct ... a sentence that does not grant proper credit for time served ... provided that a party may not file a motion to correct an illegal sentence under this *149 subdivision ... during the pendency of a direct appeal.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shirley v. State, 34 So. 3d 148, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5584, 2010 WL 1687636 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
34 So. 3d 148 (Shirley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hodge v. State
34 So. 3d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)