Hodge v. State

34 So. 3d 148, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5593, 2010 WL 1687637
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 2010·No. 4D08-4626·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking the defendant’s probation but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying which conditions of probation have been violated. See Drayton v. State, 710 So.2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodge v. State, 34 So. 3d 148, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5593, 2010 WL 1687637 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

34 So. 3d 148 (Hodge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shirley v. State
34 So. 3d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)