Shipp v. Smith

1 Ga. L. Rep. 7
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shipp v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 Ga. 1
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 1, 1885·Published

Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

It was held in the case of Bush vs. Lester, 55 Ga., 579 et seq., that the amending act of Congress of March 3,1873, did not make unconstitutional provisions of State laws a part of the system of bank[8]*8ruptcy. Therefore a debt made prior to the constitution of 1868 could subject a homestead granted thereunder by the State law, and could also subject it, though the exemption was made by the Bankrupt Court. 10 Bankrupt It., 1.

James F. Rodgers, for plaintiff in error. Ray & Walker; McHenry & McHenry, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shipp v. Smith, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 7 (Ga. 1885).

1 Ga. L. Rep. 7 (Shipp v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bush v. Lester
55 Ga. 579 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1876)