Shipp v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Shipp v. Smith

1 Ga. L. Rep. 7

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 7 (Shipp v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shipp v. Smith, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 7 (Ga. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

It was held in the case of Bush vs. Lester, 55 Ga., 579 et seq., that the amending act of Congress of March 3,1873, did not make unconstitutional provisions of State laws a part of the system of bank[8]*8ruptcy. Therefore a debt made prior to the constitution of 1868 could subject a homestead granted thereunder by the State law, and could also subject it, though the exemption was made by the Bankrupt Court. 10 Bankrupt It., 1.

James F. Rodgers, for plaintiff in error. Ray & Walker; McHenry & McHenry, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson, C. J.

It was held in the case of Bush vs. Lester, 55 Ga., 579 et seq., that the amending act of Congress of March 3,1873, did not make unconstitutional provisions of State laws a part of the system of bank[8]*8ruptcy. Therefore a debt made prior to the constitution of 1868 could subject a homestead granted thereunder by the State law, and could also subject it, though the exemption was made by the Bankrupt Court. 10 Bankrupt It., 1.

James F. Rodgers, for plaintiff in error. Ray & Walker; McHenry & McHenry, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ga. L. Rep. 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipp-v-smith-ga-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack