Shipman v. Porter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Shipman v. Porter

1916 OK 93, 154 P. 1185, 55 Okla. 120, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 121

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shipman v. Porter. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 Okla. 265 →

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 25, 1916·No. 6649·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

No brief having been filed herein by the plaintiff in error, and the defendant in error having filed a motion to dismiss for that reason on November 15, 1915, and having since filed an additional motion to affirm for failure to file brief, and neither of these motions having received any response from the plaintiff in error, the court is of the opinion that the appeal was for delay only, and, under rule No. 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), we recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

No brief having been filed herein by the plaintiff in error, and the defendant in error having filed a motion to dismiss for that reason on November 15, 1915, and having since filed an additional motion to affirm for failure to file brief, and neither of these motions having received any response from the plaintiff in error, the court is of the opinion that the appeal was for delay only, and, under rule No. 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), we recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Shipman v. Porter, 1916 OK 93, 154 P. 1185, 55 Okla. 120, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 121 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

1916 OK 93 (Shipman v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.