Shipman v. Porter

1915 OK 281, 149 P. 902, 48 Okla. 284, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 624
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 11, 1915·No. 4240·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This action was begun in the district court of Tulsa county by H. P. Porter, defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Robert Shipman and David Shipman, plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, to recover upon a promissory note.

The parties, pleadings, rulings, and errors assigned in •this case are the same, except as to the time of maturity of the promissory note sued upon, as in the case of Robert Shipman et al. v. H. P. Porter, ante, 149 Pac. 901.

Upon the authorities cited in said case, this cause should be reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shipman v. Porter, 1915 OK 281, 149 P. 902, 48 Okla. 284, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 624 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 281 (Shipman v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bartels v. Suter
1928 OK 151 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)