Shipley v. Shipley
This text of 50 N.W.2d 103 (Shipley v. Shipley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff filed a petition in the district court to modify a decree of divorce. The defendant, cross-petitioner, demurred to the petition. The demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff appeals.
The ruling on the demurrer was not followed by a judgment of dismissal nor any order showing final disposition of the case.
In Larson v. Sloan, 77 Neb. 438, 109 N. W. 752, this court held: “An order sustaining a general demurrer to a petition, not followed by a judgment of dismissal or other final disposition of the case, is not a final order *873 or judgment, and is not reviewable in this court.” See, also, Miller v. B. & M. R. R. Co., 7 Neb. 227; State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank of Omaha, 131 Neb. 223, 267 N. W. 532; Cozad Ditch Co. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist., 132 Neb. 547, 272 N. W. 560; State ex rel. Johnson v. Consumers Public Power Dist., 142 Neb. 114, 5 N. W. 2d 202; § 25-1902, R. R. S. 1943.
For the reason given herein, the plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 N.W.2d 103, 154 Neb. 872, 1951 Neb. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipley-v-shipley-neb-1951.