Miller v. B. & M. R. R. Co.

7 Neb. 227
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Maxwell, J.

The pretended judgment in this case is as follows: This cause coming on to be heard on the demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition heretofore filed, the court, after hearing the argument of counsel thereon, and after due consideration, sustained said demurrer and rendered judgment for the defendant, and against the plaintiff, for the costs of the action taxed at. $11.20.”

This is not a judgment, but a mere recital that one was rendered. Preuit v. The People, 5 Neb., 377.

It nowhere appears that the' cause was dismissed. Where a demurrer to a petition is sustained in the court below, to authorize a review of the case by the supreme court there must be a final judgment dismissing it. Otherwise a party might obtain leave of court to amend his petition and proceed in the case. As there is no final judgment, the cause is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. B. & M. R. R. Co., 7 Neb. 227 (Neb. 1878).

7 Neb. 227 (Miller v. B. & M. R. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shipley v. Shipley
50 N.W.2d 103 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1951)
Anson v. Kruse
25 N.W.2d 896 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1947)
State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank
267 N.W. 532 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1936)
Wells v. State
97 So. 681 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Hackler v. Miller
112 N.W. 303 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1907)
State ex rel. Cronin v. Cronin
106 N.W. 986 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)
Stone v. Neeley
51 N.W. 314 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1892)
Scofield v. State National Bank
8 Neb. 16 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1878)