Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Shillingford v. Dielinger

Shillingford v. Dielinger

101 A.D.3d 889, 954 N.Y.2d 907
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 12, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 101 A.D.3d 889 (Shillingford v. Dielinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shillingford v. Dielinger, 101 A.D.3d 889, 954 N.Y.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s determination that she failed to establish a substantial change in circumstances warranting an upward modification of child support (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Matter of Grade v Donovan, 84 AD3d 1375, 1376 [2011]; Matter of Simmons v Simmons, 71 AD3d 775, 776 [2010]; Matter of Heyward v Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2005]). Mastro, J.P., Lott, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Redd v. Burrell
2016 NY Slip Op 8365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Lally v. Aebly
128 A.D.3d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.3d 889, 954 N.Y.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shillingford-v-dielinger-nyappdiv-2012.