Matter of Lally v. Aebly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Lally v. Aebly

128 A.D.3d 699, 6 N.Y.S.3d 495

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2015

Docket2014-09742

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.3d 699 (Matter of Lally v. Aebly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Lally v. Aebly, 128 A.D.3d 699, 6 N.Y.S.3d 495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Robin M. Kent, J.), dated September 18, 2014. The order denied the mother’s objections to a prior order of that court (Kathleen Watson, S.M.) dated April 3, 2014, which, inter alia, after a hearing, dismissed the mother’s petition to modify the father’s child support obligation, as set forth in the parties’ judgment of divorce.

Ordered that the order dated September 18, 2014, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s determination that she did not establish a substantial change in circumstances warranting an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Matter of Shillingford v Dielinger, 101 AD3d 889 [2012]; Matter of Gracie v Donovan, 84 AD3d 1375 [2011]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Dickerson and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Robin M. Kent, J.), dated September 18, 2014. The order denied the mother’s objections to a prior order of that court (Kathleen Watson, S.M.) dated April 3, 2014, which, inter alia, after a hearing, dismissed the mother’s petition to modify the father’s child support obligation, as set forth in the parties’ judgment of divorce.

Ordered that the order dated September 18, 2014, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s determination that she did not establish a substantial change in circumstances warranting an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Matter of Shillingford v Dielinger, 101 AD3d 889 [2012]; Matter of Gracie v Donovan, 84 AD3d 1375 [2011]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Dickerson and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.3d 699, 6 N.Y.S.3d 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-lally-v-aebly-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack