Shields v. Bobby Murray Chevrolet, Inc.
266 S.E.2d 658, 300 N.C. 366, 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 326, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 1076
Opinion
Because of illness, Justice Brock did not participate in this case. The remaining six justices are equally divided as to whether the defendant’s evidence when considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff shows as a matter of law that there has been no violation of G.S. 25-9-504 or G.S. 75-1.1. Accordingly, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without precedential value. See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E. 2d 260 (1974) and cases cited therein.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shields v. Bobby Murray Chevrolet, Inc., 266 S.E.2d 658, 300 N.C. 366, 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 326, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 1076 (N.C. 1980).
266 S.E.2d 658 (Shields v. Bobby Murray Chevrolet, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kempson v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
403 S.E.2d 279 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1991)
Joyce v. Clover-Brook Homes, Inc.
344 S.E.2d 58 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
Felton v. Hospital Guild of Thomasville, Inc.
296 S.E.2d 297 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)