Shields v. Bobby Murray Chevrolet, Inc.
This text of 266 S.E.2d 658 (Shields v. Bobby Murray Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because of illness, Justice Brock did not participate in this case. The remaining six justices are equally divided as to whether the defendant’s evidence when considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff shows as a matter of law that there has been no violation of G.S. 25-9-504 or G.S. 75-1.1. Accordingly, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without precedential value. See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E. 2d 260 (1974) and cases cited therein.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 S.E.2d 658, 300 N.C. 366, 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 326, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 1076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shields-v-bobby-murray-chevrolet-inc-nc-1980.