Shetiwy v. Midland Credit Management
This text of 706 F. App'x 30 (Shetiwy v. Midland Credit Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the District Court’s order of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f) and 41(b).
In this case, Plaintiffs make no arguments concerning the District Court’s final order in their principal brief. An appellant is deemed to have waived arguable claims on an issue that is not argued in his or her principal brief. See, e.g., Gross v. Rell, 585 F.3d 72, 95 (2d Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the District Court’s order of July 25, 2016 is affirmed.
CONCLUSION
We AFFIRM the District Court’s order of July 25,2016.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 F. App'x 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shetiwy-v-midland-credit-management-ca2-2017.