Sherwin v. United States

Supreme Court

Sherwin v. United States

312 U.S. 654, 61 S. Ct. 618

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 10, 1941·No. No. 319; No. 320·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

On the Government’s confession of error, its motion to reverse is granted. The judgments are reversed, and the causes are remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with [655] directions to consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, and petitio'ners’ assignment of error with respect to the argument of the Assistant United States Attorney without regard to any technical deficiency in its phraseology.

Messrs. Earl C. Demoss and Charles M. Trammell, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Rogge, and Messrs. William W. Barron, J. Albert Woll, and William J. Connor for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

On the Government’s confession of error, its motion to reverse is granted. The judgments are reversed, and the causes are remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with [655] directions to consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, and petitio'ners’ assignment of error with respect to the argument of the Assistant United States Attorney without regard to any technical deficiency in its phraseology.

Messrs. Earl C. Demoss and Charles M. Trammell, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Rogge, and Messrs. William W. Barron, J. Albert Woll, and William J. Connor for the United States.

Sherwin v. United States, 312 U.S. 654, 61 S. Ct. 618 (1941).

Pincite

312 U.S. 654 (Sherwin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related