Sherwin v. United States

Supreme Court

Sherwin v. United States

312 U.S. 654, 61 S. Ct. 618

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 10, 1941

DocketNo. 319; No. 320

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 312 U.S. 654 (Sherwin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherwin v. United States, 312 U.S. 654, 61 S. Ct. 618 (1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

On the Government’s confession of error, its motion to reverse is granted. The judgments are reversed, and the causes are remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with [655]*655directions to consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, and petitio'ners’ assignment of error with respect to the argument of the Assistant United States Attorney without regard to any technical deficiency in its phraseology.

Messrs. Earl C. Demoss and Charles M. Trammell, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Rogge, and Messrs. William W. Barron, J. Albert Woll, and William J. Connor for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

On the Government’s confession of error, its motion to reverse is granted. The judgments are reversed, and the causes are remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with [655]*655directions to consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, and petitio'ners’ assignment of error with respect to the argument of the Assistant United States Attorney without regard to any technical deficiency in its phraseology.

Messrs. Earl C. Demoss and Charles M. Trammell, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Rogge, and Messrs. William W. Barron, J. Albert Woll, and William J. Connor for the United States.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

312 U.S. 654, 61 S. Ct. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherwin-v-united-states-scotus-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack