Sheridan v. United States
This text of 118 F.2d 828 (Sheridan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Sherwin v. United States, 61 S.Ct. 618, 85 L.Ed. -, and Sheridan v. United States, 61 S.Ct. 619, 85 L.Ed. -, the Supreme Court reversed our decision (112 F.2d 503) and remanded these cases with directions to consider (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts and (2) the assignment of error with respect to the argument of the Assistant United States Attorney. We have done so and have concluded (1) that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdicts, and (2) that there is no merit in the assignment of error with respect to the argument of the Assistant United States Attorney.
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 F.2d 828, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheridan-v-united-states-ca9-1941.