Sherry McDaniel v. Kraft Global Foods

632 F. App'x 314
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 2016
Docket15-2275
StatusUnpublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 632 F. App'x 314 (Sherry McDaniel v. Kraft Global Foods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherry McDaniel v. Kraft Global Foods, 632 F. App'x 314 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sherry McDaniel appeals after the district court 1 dismissed her Title VII com *315 plaint as barred by the statute of limitations. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper, as McDaniel’s own filings showed that she brought her lawsuit more than ninety days after receiving a right-to-sue notice from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and tolling of the limitations period was not warranted. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (setting forth 90-day limitations period); Richter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 851 (8th Cir.2012) (explaining application of statute of limitation); Garfield v. J.C. Nichols Real Estate, 57 F.3d 662, 666 (8th Cir.1995) (discussing equitable tolling); see also Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp., 517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir.2008) (de novo standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District *315 of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 F. App'x 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherry-mcdaniel-v-kraft-global-foods-ca8-2016.