Sherman v. Sherman

304 A.D.2d 745, 757 N.Y.S.2d 761

This text of 304 A.D.2d 745 (Sherman v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherman v. Sherman, 304 A.D.2d 745, 757 N.Y.S.2d 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered August 24, 2001, the defendant appeals from (1) a money judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Skelos, J.), entered October 3, 2001, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $6,825, and (2) a money judgment of the same court, also entered October 3, 2001, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $129,355.90.

Ordered that the money judgment in the principal sum of $6,825 is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the money judgment in the principal sum of $129,355.90 is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiff’s failure to make a formal motion seeking the relief obtained in the money judgments does not warrant vacatur of the money judgments. Not only did the plaintiff serve the defendant with the judgment of divorce, but she served him with notice of settlement for both proposed money judgments (see Donaghy v Donaghy, 203 AD2d 803 [1994]).

However, the money judgment in the principal sum of $129,355.90, which is based on the plaintiff’s distributive award, must be reversed because of our determination on a related appeal (see Sherman v Sherman, 304 AD2d 744 [decided [746]*746herewith]). Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donaghy v. Donaghy
203 A.D.2d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Sherman v. Sherman
304 A.D.2d 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 A.D.2d 745, 757 N.Y.S.2d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-sherman-nyappdiv-2003.