Sherman v. GOLD KIST, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sherman v. GOLD KIST, INC.

230 S.W.3d 661, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1150, 2007 WL 2363604

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 21, 2007

DocketED 88804

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 S.W.3d 661 (Sherman v. GOLD KIST, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. GOLD KIST, INC., 230 S.W.3d 661, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1150, 2007 WL 2363604 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Delores Sherman d/b/a Deeco Food Services (“Plaintiff”) appeals a judgment from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dismissing all of her claims against Gold Kist, Inc. (“Respondent”) upon a finding that her claims are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.

In Plaintiffs only point on appeal, Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff contends that the trial court should have calculated the statute of limitations from the date her commissions accrued and not the date the relationship between the parties terminated. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI