NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION v. Williams

230 S.W.3d 661, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1168, 2007 WL 2363607
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 21, 2007·No. ED 88789·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Loretta Williams appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Neighbors Credit Union. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find appellant’s brief severely deficient. The brief wholly fails to comply with Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04, and as such precludes meaningful review. Dismissal of the appeal is appropriate under these circumstances. Nonetheless, after reviewing the claims ex gratia, as best we can discern from appellant’s brief there is no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION v. Williams, 230 S.W.3d 661, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1168, 2007 WL 2363607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

230 S.W.3d 661 (NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherman v. GOLD KIST, INC.
230 S.W.3d 661 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)