NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION v. Williams

230 S.W.3d 661, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1168, 2007 WL 2363607

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 21, 2007

DocketED 88789

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 S.W.3d 661 (NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION v. Williams, 230 S.W.3d 661, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1168, 2007 WL 2363607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Loretta Williams appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Neighbors Credit Union. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find appellant’s brief severely deficient. The brief wholly fails to comply with Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04, and as such precludes meaningful review. Dismissal of the appeal is appropriate under these circumstances. Nonetheless, after reviewing the claims ex gratia, as best we can discern from appellant’s brief there is no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Loretta Williams appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Neighbors Credit Union. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find appellant’s brief severely deficient. The brief wholly fails to comply with Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04, and as such precludes meaningful review. Dismissal of the appeal is appropriate under these circumstances. Nonetheless, after reviewing the claims ex gratia, as best we can discern from appellant’s brief there is no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.W.3d 661, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1168, 2007 WL 2363607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neighbors-credit-union-v-williams-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack