Sherlock v. Couper

43 Fla. 51
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 43 Fla. 51 (Sherlock v. Couper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherlock v. Couper, 43 Fla. 51 (Fla. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.:

This cause coming on for final consideration in its [52]*52regular order on the docket, and it appearing to the court that the decree appealed from is a joint one in favor of W. P. Couper, Fannie D. Conant in her own right and as executrix of the last will of Sherman Conant, deceased, and M. O. Arnold, and against the appellant, and M.'O. Arnold not being made a party to- the appeal, either as appellant or appellee, and not having appeared in any manner in this court, and said M. O. Arnold being a necessary party to the appeal, the said appeal is, therefore, hereby dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hay v. Isetts
125 So. 237 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota
111 So. 892 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.
106 So. 408 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Fla. 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherlock-v-couper-fla-1901.