Sherlock v. Couper

43 Fla. 51
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 15, 1901·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.:

This cause coming on for final consideration in its [52]*52regular order on the docket, and it appearing to the court that the decree appealed from is a joint one in favor of W. P. Couper, Fannie D. Conant in her own right and as executrix of the last will of Sherman Conant, deceased, and M. O. Arnold, and against the appellant, and M.'O. Arnold not being made a party to- the appeal, either as appellant or appellee, and not having appeared in any manner in this court, and said M. O. Arnold being a necessary party to the appeal, the said appeal is, therefore, hereby dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherlock v. Couper, 43 Fla. 51 (Fla. 1901).

43 Fla. 51 (Sherlock v. Couper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hay v. Isetts
125 So. 237 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota
111 So. 892 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.
106 So. 408 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)