Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota
111 So. 892, 92 Fla. 1018
Opinion
The record in this canse has been examined and the motion to dismiss for lack of proper parties is granted on authority of Sherlock v. Couper, 43 Fla. 51, 29 South. Rep. 444; Bridges & Co. v. Carlton, 56 Fla. 843, 48 South. Rep. 46; Bate v. Cook, 89 Fla. 40, 103 South. Rep. 126; Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Inv. Co., — Fla. 105 South. Rep. 819.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota, 111 So. 892, 92 Fla. 1018 (Fla. 1926).
111 So. 892 (Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bate v. Cook
103 So. 126 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Investment Co.
105 So. 819 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Sherlock v. Couper
43 Fla. 51 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1901)
Rawls v. Carlton
56 Fla. 843 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)