Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota
111 So. 892, 92 Fla. 1018
This text of 111 So. 892 (Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota, 111 So. 892, 92 Fla. 1018 (Fla. 1926).
Opinion
The record in this canse has been examined and the motion to dismiss for lack of proper parties is granted on authority of Sherlock v. Couper, 43 Fla. 51, 29 South. Rep. 444; Bridges & Co. v. Carlton, 56 Fla. 843, 48 South. Rep. 46; Bate v. Cook, 89 Fla. 40, 103 South. Rep. 126; Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Inv. Co., — Fla. 105 South. Rep. 819.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bate v. Cook
103 So. 126 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Investment Co.
105 So. 819 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Sherlock v. Couper
43 Fla. 51 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1901)
Rawls v. Carlton
56 Fla. 843 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 So. 892, 92 Fla. 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-bank-of-sarasota-fla-1926.