Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota

111 So. 892, 92 Fla. 1018
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 30, 1926·Published

Opinion

*1019 Per Curiam.

The record in this canse has been examined and the motion to dismiss for lack of proper parties is granted on authority of Sherlock v. Couper, 43 Fla. 51, 29 South. Rep. 444; Bridges & Co. v. Carlton, 56 Fla. 843, 48 South. Rep. 46; Bate v. Cook, 89 Fla. 40, 103 South. Rep. 126; Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Inv. Co., — Fla. 105 South. Rep. 819.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota, 111 So. 892, 92 Fla. 1018 (Fla. 1926).

111 So. 892 (Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bate v. Cook
103 So. 126 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Investment Co.
105 So. 819 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Sherlock v. Couper
43 Fla. 51 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1901)
Rawls v. Carlton
56 Fla. 843 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)