SHEPPARD v. United States

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana
DecidedJanuary 22, 2021
Docket1:20-cv-03319
StatusUnknown

This text of SHEPPARD v. United States (SHEPPARD v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SHEPPARD v. United States, (S.D. Ind. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

FLORIDA G. SHEPPARD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-03319-JPH-MJD ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner Florida Sheppard is an inmate of the Indiana Department of Correction confined at Plainfield Correctional Facility. He is serving sentences for convictions under Indiana Criminal Case Nos. 20D06-1006-FC-11 and 20D06-1109-FD-262. He has filed a petition entitled "Writ of Compassionate Release or Reduction of Sentence," seeking compassionate release under provisions of the federal First Step Act, codified as 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(i). The First Step Act permits a federal prisoner to seek a reduction of his sentence upon a showing that "extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(i). The Court has no authority to order the State of Indiana to reduce Mr. Sheppard's sentence under the terms of the First Step Act. If Mr. Sheppard seeks to challenge his current confinement on constitutional grounds, he must first exhaust state court remedies. "To protect the primary role of state courts in remedying alleged constitutional errors in state criminal proceedings, federal courts will not review a habeas petition unless the prisoner has fairly presented his claims throughout at least one complete round of state-court review, whether on direct appeal of his conviction or in post-conviction proceedings." Johnson v. Foster, 786 F.3d 501, 504 (7th Cir. 2015) (citation and quotation marks omitted); see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). As for his claim for release due to the COVID-19 pandemic, he has failed to show that he exhausted state court remedies before bringing his petition. Therefore, this claim is also barred. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2); Money v. Pritzker, 453 F.Supp.3d at 1103, 1316 (N.D. IIL. Apr. 10, 2020) (denying habeas relief based on COVID-19 conditions and finding that "Plaintiffs have not made a satisfactory showing that the state court system was not every bit as available as the federal courts, if not more so."). It appears that Mr. Sheppard has not presented his claim for release through one complete round of state-court review in the Indiana state courts before filing his habeas petition. Mr. Sheppard shall have through February 12, 2021, to show cause why this habeas petition should not be dismissed without prejudice because the petitioner failed to exhaust his state court remedies. SO ORDERED. Date: 1/22/2021

Slam ruck lbanlove James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge pe Southern District of Indiana Distribution: FLORIDA G. SHEPPARD 266129 PLAINFIELD - CF PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Inmate Mail/Parcels 727 MOON ROAD PLAINFIELD, IN 46168

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steven Johnson v. Brian Foster
786 F.3d 501 (Seventh Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SHEPPARD v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheppard-v-united-states-insd-2021.