Shepard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shepard v. State

139 S.E. 90, 37 Ga. App. 158, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 541

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 26, 1927

Docket18254

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 S.E. 90 (Shepard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shepard v. State, 139 S.E. 90, 37 Ga. App. 158, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 541 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Bkoyees, C. J.

1. An objection to evidence that it is “irrelevant, immaterial, and prejudicial to the defendant” is too general to be considered by the reviewing court. Martin v. State, 35 Ga. App. 575 (2-a) (134 S. E. 185), and cit.

2. Under the facts of the case the excerpt from the charge excepted to shows no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

3. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI