Shemwell v. State
391 So. 2d 218, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18206
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 29, 1980
DocketNo. 80-976
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 391 So. 2d 218 (Shemwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shemwell v. State, 391 So. 2d 218, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18206 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
Opinion
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, but the case is remanded for resen-tencing. The sentence incorrectly failed to provide the period of credit time to be allowed appellant as required by Section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Brooker v. State, 362 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Appellant need not be present at resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matthews v. State
408 So. 2d 781 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Crawford v. State
406 So. 2d 1234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
391 So. 2d 218, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shemwell-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.