Shemwell v. State
391 So. 2d 218, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18206
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 29, 1980·No. No. 80-976·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, but the case is remanded for resen-tencing. The sentence incorrectly failed to provide the period of credit time to be allowed appellant as required by Section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Brooker v. State, 362 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Appellant need not be present at resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shemwell v. State, 391 So. 2d 218, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18206 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
391 So. 2d 218 (Shemwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matthews v. State
408 So. 2d 781 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Crawford v. State
406 So. 2d 1234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)