Matthews v. State

408 So. 2d 781, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18980
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 13, 1982·No. No. 81-994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, but the case is remanded for resen-tencing. The sentence incorrectly failed to provide the period of credit time to be allowed appellant as required by section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Shemwell v. State, 391 So.2d 218 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Appellant need not be present at resentenc-ing.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthews v. State, 408 So. 2d 781, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18980 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

408 So. 2d 781 (Matthews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
439 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)