Matthews v. State

408 So. 2d 781, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18980
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 13, 1982
DocketNo. 81-994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 408 So. 2d 781 (Matthews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthews v. State, 408 So. 2d 781, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18980 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, but the case is remanded for resen-tencing. The sentence incorrectly failed to provide the period of credit time to be allowed appellant as required by section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Shemwell v. State, 391 So.2d 218 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Appellant need not be present at resentenc-ing.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
439 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
408 So. 2d 781, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.